Holobiont Integration June DNA RNA Extractions

June DNA RNA Extractions

20190606 E.S.

Testing the soft and hard homogenization protocol on extra molecular samples from the recovery time period of the Holobiont Integration project. 2 M. capitata and 2 P. acuta fragments were randomly chosen.

Soft and Hard homogenization, and DNA/RNA Extractions followed this protocol. General Zymo Duet RNA DNA Extraction protocol found here.

Original samples:

ORIGIN Site.Name POINT SITE.ID Species COLLECT.DATE PLUG.ID TANK# TREATMENT ANALYSIS TIME TIME POINT SAMPLING.DATE Dead.Alive NOTES Sample Location Shipment Date Lab Work Lab Work by Lab Work Date
SITE 4 Reef.11.13 6 P60 Pacuta 20180907 1431 6 ATAC Molecular 11:24 11 20181215 Alive In Tank 6 20181118; off plug In Transit to URI 20190206 Soft and hard homogenization ES 20190606
SITE 1 Lilipuna.Fringe 6 M54 Mcapitata 20180908 1591 8 ATAC Molecular 10:12 11 20181215 Alive In Tank 8 20181118 In Transit to URI 20190206 Soft and hard homogenization ES 20190606
SITE 3 Reef.18 5 M45 Mcapitata 20180910 2309 6 ATAC Molecular 11:28 11 20181215 Alive In Tank 6 20181118; off plug In Transit to URI 20190206 Soft and hard homogenization ES 20190606
SITE 3 Reef.18 8 P72 Pacuta 20180910 2364 6 ATAC Molecular 11:27 11 20181215 Alive In Tank 6 20181118 In Transit to URI 20190206 Soft and hard homogenization ES 20190606

Observations:

  • Vortexing for two minutes was more than enough time. The P. acuta tissue came off quicker than M. capitata. This might cause problems later in the protocol. Maybe less beads or more fragment pieces?
  • Both homogenization steps got at least 500 uL of sample.
  • Almost all of the tissue from fragment 1431 came off during the “soft” homogenization step.
  • After hard homogenization, not all of the tissue from the M. capitata came off the skeleton, but the liquid was dark brown.
  • Tissue Lyser was broken, so bead bug was used for the “hard” homogenization step instead. Run at 400 speed and 30 seconds.
  • Heating started at 12:55, ended at 2:25.

Changes to protocol:

  • Half of the beads from bead bug machine tubes were used.
  • 500 uL of shield used instead of 1000 uL for the “hard” homogenization step.
  • 30 uL of Proteinase K Buffer, and 15 uL of Proteinase K used.
  • Proteinase K buffer and Proteinase K added after bead beating steps.

Calculations:
DNAse I

  • 75 uL buffer x 8 samples = 600 uL buffer
  • 5 uL DNAse I x 8 samples = 40 uL DNAse I

Qubit Master Mix (x2 for DNA and RNA)

  • 8 samples + 2 standards + 0.2% error = 10.2 uL of Quant-IT Reagent
  • 199 x 10.2 = 2,029.8 uL buffer

2 standards: 190 uL Master Mix + 10 uL standard
16 samples: 199 uL Master Mix + 1 uL sample

15 minute incubation started at 15:44

  • Re-aliquoted fragment 1591 hard and soft DNA and RNA tubes

Qubit (Protocol)Results
dsDNA broad range

DNA(ng/uL) Trial 1 Trial 2 Avg
Standard 1 174.13 NA NA
Standard 2 18,408.70 NA NA
1591 Hard 109 107 108
1591 Soft 54.4 53.8 54.1
1431 Hard 130 130 130
1431 Soft 193 192 192.5
2309 Hard 65.8 65.2 65.5
2309 Soft 47.6 47.2 47.4
2364 Hard 199 198 198.5
2364 Soft 55.4 54.8 55.1

RNA broad range

RNA (ng/uL) Trial 1 Trial 2 Avg
Standard 1 396.31 NA NA
Standard 2 10,506.90 NA NA
1591 Hard 66.2 66.2 66.2
1591 Soft 73.2 73 73.1
1431 Hard 158 158 158
1431 Soft 274 274 274
2309 Hard 75.6 75.4 75.5
2309 Soft 32.4 32.4 32.4
2364 Hard 193 193 193
2364 Soft 202 202 202

Gel Electrophoresis (Protocol):

Sample order: Ladder, 2364 Hard, 2364 Soft, 2309 Hard, 2309 Soft, 1431 Hard, 1431 Soft, 1591 Hard, 1591 Soft Image

TapeStation (Protocol) Results:

  • Thermocycler (rna denature program): 3 minutes at 72 °C, 2 minutes at 4 °C, hold at 4 °C. start 18:15 end 18:21
  • TapeStation start 18:28 end 18:38
  • Ladder: Agilen RNA screentape ladder
Coral ID Tape Station ID RIN^e
Ladder A1 NA
1591 Hard B1 3.3
1591 Soft C1 4
1431 Hard D1 7
1431 Soft E1 7.7
2309 Hard F1 7.1
2309 Soft G1 8.3
2364 Hard H1 4.1
2364 Soft A2 6.9

Link to 20190606 report
Link to Agilent 4200 TapeStation System

20190610 E.S.

We chose one M. capitata and one P. acuta of the four from Testing Round 1 to test the vortex timing in the soft homogenization step. During the first round of protocol testing, the tissue on the P. acuta fragments came off much quicker than the M. capitata and therefore might need a shorter vortex time during the soft homogenization.

Soft and Hard homogenization, and DNA/RNA Extractions followed this protocol. General Zymo Duet RNA DNA Extraction protocol found here.
Modified from original Zymo Duet RNA/DNA Extraction protocol

Samples used:

ORIGIN Site.Name POINT SITE.ID Species COLLECT.DATE PLUG.ID TANK# TREATMENT ANALYSIS TIME TIME POINT SAMPLING.DATE Dead.Alive NOTES Sample Location Shipment Date Lab Work Lab Work by Lab Work Date
SITE 4 Reef.11.13 6 P60 Pacuta 20180907 1431 6 ATAC Molecular 11:24 11 20181215 Alive In Tank 6 20181118; off plug In Transit to URI 20190206 Soft and hard homogenization ES 20190606; 20190610
SITE 1 Lilipuna.Fringe 6 M54 Mcapitata 20180908 1591 8 ATAC Molecular 10:12 11 20181215 Alive In Tank 8 20181118 In Transit to URI 20190206 Soft and hard homogenization ES 20190606; 20190610
Extraction # Coral ID Species Soft homogenization time
1 1431 P. acuta 30 seconds
2 1431 P. acuta 1 minute
3 1431 P. acuta 1.5 minutes
4 1431 P. acuta 2 minutes
5 1591 M. capitata 30 seconds
6 1591 M. capitata 1 minute
7 1591 M. capitata 1.5 minutes
8 1591 M. capitata 2 minutes

General extraction notes:

  • Clipped coral fragments into 4-5 pieces small enough to fit in a 1.5 microcentrifuge tube.
  • Tubes #2 and #4 look a lot paler than #1 and #3 (all 1431 P. acuta). This could be because of the size of cut pieces and position tube. P. acuta seems to be more sensitive than the M. capitata pieces.
  • Tubes #5-8 coloring looks similar across all four tubes. Tube #5 looks like it still has the most tissue on the skeleton after vortexing. Which makes sense it was vortexed for a shorter amount of time.
  • Hard homogenization was done with the vortex for 30 seconds at a time until most of the tissue was off the skeleton. We were out of bead bug tubes and beads, and the Tissue Lyster is still broken. Hard homogenization went for 1.5 minutes. All tubes had the same amount of time for hard homogenization.
  • Tubes #5 and #6 were very mucus-y and harder to pipette. The tissue doesn’t seem to be broken down enough.
  • After hard and soft homogenizations, I would predict that M. capitata needs at least 1.5 minutes - 2 minutes and P. acuta needs around 1 minute. But the size and position of P. acuta fragment pieces in the tube seem to affect the time needed in soft homogenization more than the M. capitata fragment pieces.
  • 300 uL of sample was taken for extraction. 30 uL Proteinase K Buffer and 15 uL Proteinase K were added to the sample before heating step. See linked Zymo protocol above for details on ratios.
  • Incubation started at 10:51, end at 12:20
  • Extractions ended at 3:45, qubit at 4:00

Calculations:
DNAse I master mix:

  • 75 uL x 16 samples (8 original samples x 2 for soft and hard) = 1,200 buffer
  • 5 uL x 16 samples (see above) = 80 uL DNAse I

Qubit master mix:
Once for DNA and once for RNA:

  • 16 samples (see above) + 2 standards + 0.2% error = 18.2 uL of Quant-IT reagent
  • 199 x 18.2 = 3,621.8 uL of buffer

Qubit Results (Protocol)

DNA          
Coral ID Extraction ID Extraction type Trial 1 Trial 2 Avg (ng/uL)
1431 1 soft 145 145 145
1431 1 hard 73.8 73.4 73.6
1431 2 soft 136 136 136
1431 2 hard 40.6 40.4 40.5
1431 3 soft 60.4 60.2 60.3
1431 3 hard 80 79.6 79.8
1431 4 soft 154 153 153.5
1431 4 hard 58 57.8 57.9
1591 5 soft 50.8 50.4 50.6
1591 5 hard 32.8 32.6 32.7
1591 6 soft 34.6 34.4 34.5
1591 6 hard 57.6 57.4 57.5
1591 7 soft 66.4 66.2 66.3
1591 7 hard 66 65.6 65.8
1591 8 soft 130 129 129.5
1591 8 hard 55.8 55.6 55.7
RNA          
Coral ID Extraction ID Extraction type Trial 1 Trial 2 Avg (ng/uL)
1431 1 soft 170 170 170
1431 1 hard 106 106 106
1431 2 soft 162 162 162
1431 2 hard 67.2 67.2 67.2
1431 3 soft 195 195 195
1431 3 hard 116 116 116
1431 4 soft 197 197 197
1431 4 hard 92.4 92.4 92.4
1591 5 soft 32.6 32.6 32.6
1591 5 hard 31.6 31.6 31.6
1591 6 soft 36 36.2 36.1
1591 6 hard 54.2 54.2 54.2
1591 7 soft 83.8 83.8 83.8
1591 7 hard 53.8 53.8 53.8
1591 8 soft 102 102 102
1591 8 hard 75.8 75.8 75.8

General notes:

  • Used a 2nd comb to fit all samples into gel
  • Much easier to keep track of samples when labeled 1-8 S/H instead of using fragment ID; only the final tubes have the all the information on them
  • Gel harden start at 3:20; qubit end at 4:30
  • Gel start 5:20, end 6:05; run at 100V for 45 minutes

Gel Electrophoresis (Protocol):

Gel order: Ladder, 1-8H, 1-8S, Ladder

20190610_image

TapeStation (Protocol)

  • 2 screentapes used (each tape has 16 slots)
  • 1st round: Ladder, 1-6H; start 5:31 end 5:41
  • 2nd round: Ladder, 1-7S, 7H, 8S, 8H; screentape switched halfway through- start 5:58 end 6:08 start 6:09 end 6:15
  • Ladder: Agilent RNA screentape ladder
Extraction # Coral ID Species Extraction Type RIN^e
1 1431 P. acuta Soft 5.4
1 1431 P. acuta Hard 3.0
2 1431 P. acuta Soft 4.3
2 1431 P. acuta Hard 3.4
3 1431 P. acuta Soft 4.3
3 1431 P. acuta Hard 3.2
4 1431 P. acuta Soft 3.6
4 1431 P. acuta Hard 3.5
5 1591 M. capitata Soft 6.6
5 1591 M. capitata Hard 6.3
6 1591 M. capitata Soft 6.9
6 1591 M. capitata Hard 5.7
7 1591 M. capitata Soft 6.6
7 1591 M. capitata Hard 5.4
8 1591 M. capitata Soft 5.9
8 1591 M. capitata Hard 5.0

Full report here: Round #1; Round #2

Concluding thoughts:

  • Extraction #5S aliquot might have had issues because this sample is faded in the Gel and the TapeStation came back with a low concentration error. This could also be because of the mucus causing issues during extractions. Qubit values were lower but not that low (DNA 50.6; RNA 32.6).
  • P. acuta DNA looks best in 2S with quantity and quality. This was 1 minute in soft homogenization step. But, the skeleton looked paler in #2 than #3, which was 1.5 minutes. This is why I think position and size factors in here too.
  • M. capitata too mucus-y in soft homogenizations equal to and under 1 minute. Needs at least 1.5 minutes to break down tissue.
  • M. capitata DNA faded in gel for both soft and hard, but M. capitata had higher quality RNA than P. acuta.
  • Hard homogenization step was done with a vortex because of equipment issues (see bullet points at beginning of post) so this could change later.
Written on February 8, 2020